Skip to main content

“This view does not necessarily involve immediate optimism.”

UU’s are often familiar with James Luther Adams quote that:

“Liberalism holds that the resources (divine and human) that are available for the achievement of meaningful change justify an attitude of ultimate optimism.”

But they don’t always know that the next sentence is:

“This view does not necessarily involve immediate optimism.”

Last night, amazing, wonderful strides forward happened for our country.  We elected an openly gay governor, two Native American women, two Muslim women. So many firsts – youngest, first Black, first woman – in their area. And some of the removals were very important – the person who refused to issue marriage licenses for gay couples, the person who wrote the “bathroom bill.”  And now, on the national level, we have reason to believe that investigations and consequences can happen, as the House changed power.

It was a very good night.

And yet, we’re disappointed, we liberals.

Of course we are.

Because as savvy and analytical as we are, there beats in our hearts that dream of the achievement of meaningful change. We read the news, studied the polls. For the most part, things happened as predicted.

But that heart beat, unperturbed, continued. We have seen so much fear. So much hate. And even at our most cynical, our insistence that yes, the arc of the universe does bend toward justice, yes, people do have inherent worth and dignity and if given the chance, will do good in the world … it causes our hearts to beat a bit wildly, optimistically. Maybe this will be the moment when the scales fall from all  eyes and all people begin working together to build Beloved Community!

We are disappointed, and it is right that we are. We hold the hope that people can be better – kinder, more mature, more just. Don’t push away the disappointment. Let it have its time. Take a rest before rebounding for the work must begin anew, as it always, always, always must.

We have an attitude of ultimate optimism. Hold on to that. Protect it. Do not allow cynicism to rob you of its power. It is the energy we need for tomorrow.

And accept … “This view does not necessarily involve immediate optimism.”


Popular posts from this blog

Don't Trust Your Instincts, or, "Well-Meaning People Can Exacerbate Big Problems"

My evangelical friends talk about being "convicted." That moment when you hear or read a message and like an arrow, it dives into your heart, and you know that you have been guilty, and you have some growing to do. At the very beginning of my learning about Bowen systems theory, the professor was laying out the basic idea: that we all feel anxiety, and when we do, we act (often in unhealthy ways) in order to lessen our anxiety. And in an unhealthy system with emotionally immature people -- a family, a business, a church -- one person's anxiety can trigger the anxiety of others. Here's a great primer on that. Really great. Like, watch it 20 times in a row. Or every morning as you drink your coffee. (I'm not kidding. I think your life would be better. Consider it a spiritual practice.) So back to my conviction moment. The professor went on to talk about how when we see someone who is "vibrating" with anxiety, our instinct is often to rush over,

The Most Controversial Thing I'll Write All Year

Back when you were a kid, you learned a lesson. It was wrong. And it's time for you to unlearn it. You learned that you were responsible for other people's feelings. Not that you should care about other people's feelings. (You should.) Not just that you should be sensitive to other people's feelings. (You should.) But you were taught that you were actually responsible for other people's feelings. It happens in almost all homes, even the loving ones. In abusive homes, it's more blatant. If Dad is unhappy, you get hit. So you learn that it is actually your responsibility to keep him happy, or there would be consequences. But even in non-abusive homes, it happened. If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.  You are not responsible for other people's feelings. That's their job. And in fact, you are crossing their boundary if you try to control their feelings. They get to decide how they feel about something, not you. They may decide that you

Me and My Collar

You may run into me on a Friday, in my neighborhood, so it's time I let you know what you might see. When I was doing my required unit of Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE), my supervisor suggested that any of us who came from traditions where a clerical collar was an option, take one "collar week," to see how we were treated, as opposed to wearing regular professional clothes. After a couple of days, I joked to the Catholic priest, "How do you manage the power?" In regular clothes, I would walk into a patient's room, and it would take about 5 or so minutes of introductions and pleasantries before we could really get down to talking about their feelings, their fears, the deep stuff. With most people, as soon as that clerical collar walked in the room, with me attached, they began pouring out all the heavy stuff they were carrying. I was riding the bus back and forth every day, and though not quite so dramatic, the collar effect was alive there, to